History remembers British mathematician Alan Turing as the father of modern computing with an ultimately tragic life, but it is impossible to summarize a single person in a handful of details. More than 70 years after his death by suicide, Turing is often remembered as an introverted and dispassionate loner, but his own words present a completely different person.

“We have distilled a version of Turing that is a two-dimensional stereotype. He has come to be seen as socially unaware, entirely concerned with logic and numbers, and quite isolated,” Sarah Dillon, a literature professor at the University of Cambridge, said in a statement.

Recently, Dillon took the time to examine a very rare and often overlooked archival item from Turing’s life: a six-page, handwritten, incomplete short story known as Pryce Buoy written by the man himself. After transcribing the draft and publishing his analysis in The review of English studies.Dillon is sure that the mathematician was a very different man from the one described today.

“His story reveals a very different man: playful, funny, cheeky, literary and someone who really liked sex,” he said.

Turing probably wrote the untitled story in late 1952 or early 1953. The narrative centers on a possible sexual encounter between a working-class man named Ron Miller and Alec Pryce, a scientist famous for inventing the ascribed title. Dillon said it is obvious that Pryce is a stand-in for Turing, and is confident that the author intended the story to be a fictionalization of the real event that led to his arrest for “gross indecency” in 1951.

“Pryce Buoy It begins with the two characters assessing each other’s intentions from afar in a park shortly before Christmas,” he said. “Then they sit side by side on a bench and continue their silent assessments.

In the text, Miller wonders about Pryce’s looks: “Could I be wrong? No, he had a furtive look. Just a little shy.”

Meanwhile, Pryce has his own opinion: “She’s not a real beauty, but [he] It had a certain appeal. “Beggars cannot choose.”

“I love the hesitation, the way it evokes the uncertainty of a possible sexual encounter, the ‘am I reading this situation wrong?’ worry,” Dillon explained. “Turing captures those tensions, the leaning in and leaning back. He does it really well.”

Unfortunately, the draft ends mid-sentence on the sixth page with the words “Ron wouldn’t do it.” Since no other drafts are likely to exist, no one will know how the two men fared in Turing’s story, whether the plot became more sexually explicit, or how it concluded. Scholars even wonder if Turing’s mother later censored the story to protect her son.

“There were clearly more and that’s very frustrating. We don’t know where the rest went,” Dillon said.

One of the most surprising revelations of Dillon’s research is not Turing’s tale, but the author who most influenced his writing: Angus Wilson. Both veteran codebreakers, they met through the social scene at King’s College, Cambridge after the Second World War.

In July 1952, Wilson published a groundbreaking and controversial gay novel called Hemlock and after. A careful reading of Pryce Buoy shows that Turing owed an enormous debt to Wilson’s book. Dillon even noted that he “copied” a portion “in many explicit ways, including replicating the order of events in the plot, reproducing the same (or very similar) phrases and diction, and adopting the narrative technique of shifting focalization that Wilson deploys throughout the book. Hemlock and after.”

However, Dillon does not understand this as a negative criticism of Turing’s story.

“When you start trying your hand as a creative writer, you copy what inspires you. It’s a kind of scaffolding because writing creatively is scary,” he said.

Although unfinished and unpolished, Pryce Buoy offers an invaluable window into one of the most influential (and sadly misunderstood) minds of the 20th century. Turing was only 41 years old when he died and was still trying to make sense of himself and a world that did not allow him to exist as he was.

“Literature offered him a really powerful way to do that,” Dillon said. “This was the moment where he really felt a release, an opportunity to be more creative and fun.”

2025 PopSci Best of what’s new

The 50 most important innovations of the year