Bremer, G. A cytological investigation of some species and species-hybrids of the genus Saccharum. Genetica 5, 273–326 (1923). Article Google Scholar Bremer, G. Problems in breeding and cytology of sugar cane. IV. The origin of the increase of chromosome number in species hybrids of Saccharum. Euphytica 10, 325–342 (1961b). Article Google Scholar OECD/FAO. OECD-FAO Agricultural
Bremer, G. A cytological investigation of some species and species-hybrids of the genus Saccharum. Genetica 5, 273–326 (1923).
Google Scholar
Bremer, G. Problems in breeding and cytology of sugar cane. IV. The origin of the increase of chromosome number in species hybrids of Saccharum. Euphytica 10, 325–342 (1961b).
Google Scholar
OECD/FAO. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2025–2034 (OECD Publishing, 2025).
Burr, G. O. et al. The sugarcane plant. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 8, 275–308 (1957).
Google Scholar
D’Hont, A. et al. Characterisation of the double genome structure of modern sugarcane cultivars (Saccharum spp.) by molecular cytogenetics. Mol. Gen. Genet. 250, 405–413 (1996).
Google Scholar
Piperidis, G., Piperidis, N. & D’Hont, A. Molecular cytogenetic investigation of chromosome composition and transmission in sugarcane. Mol. Genet. Genomics 284, 65–73 (2010).
Google Scholar
D’Hont, A. Unraveling the genome structure of polyploids using FISH and GISH; examples of sugarcane and banana. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 109, 27–33 (2005).
Google Scholar
Price, S. Cytological studies in Saccharum and allied genera VII. Maternal chromosome transmission by S. officinarum in intra- and interspecific crosses. Bot. Gaz. 122, 298–305 (1961).
Google Scholar
Bielig, L. M., Mariani, A. & Berding, N. Cytological studies of 2n male gamete formation in sugarcane, Saccharum L. Euphytica 133, 117–124 (2003).
Google Scholar
Narayanaswami, S. Megasporogenesis and origin of triploids in Saccharum. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 10, 534–551 (1940).
Zhang, J. et al. Allele-defined genome of the autopolyploid sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum L. Nat. Genet. 50, 1565–1573 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. et al. Genomic insights into the recent chromosome reduction of autopolyploid sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum. Nat. Genet. 54, 885–896 (2022).
Google Scholar
Healey, A. L. et al. The complex polyploid genome architecture of sugarcane. Nature 628, 804–810 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bao, Y. et al. A chromosomal-scale genome assembly of modern cultivated hybrid sugarcane provides insights into origination and evolution. Nat. Commun. 15, 3041 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. The highly allo-autopolyploid modern sugarcane genome and very recent allopolyploidization in Saccharum. Nat. Genet. 57, 242–253 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wang, J. et al. Genetic architecture of sugarcane traits in a polyploid genomics framework. Nature 654, 994–1003 (2026).
Google Scholar
Rhie, A., Walenz, B., Koren, S. & Phillippy, A. Merqury: reference-free quality, completeness, and phasing assessment for genome assemblies. Genome Biol. 21, 245 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bretagnolle, F. & Thompson, J. D. Gametes with the somatic chromosome number: mechanisms of their formation and role in the evolution of autopolyploid plants. New Phytol. 129, 1–22 (1995).
Google Scholar
Bremer, G. Problems in breeding and cytology of sugar cane. II, the sugar cane breeding from a cytological view-point. Euphytica 10, 121–258 (1961).
Google Scholar
Bremer, G. Increase of chromosome number in species-hybrids of Saccharum in relation to the embryosac development. Bibliogr. Genet. 18, 99 (1959).
Ramanna, M. S. & Jacobsen, E. Relevance of sexual polyploidization for crop improvement. Euphytica 133, 3–8 (2003).
Google Scholar
Wijnker, E. et al. The genomic landscape of meiotic crossovers and gene conversions in Arabidopsis thaliana. eLife 2, e01426 (2013).
Google Scholar
Choi, K. et al. Arabidopsis meiotic crossover hotspots overlap with H2A.Z nucleosomes at gene promoters. Nat. Genet. 45, 1327–1336 (2013).
Google Scholar
Kreiner, J. M., Kron, P. & Husband, B. C. Frequency and maintenance of unreduced gametes in natural plant populations: associations with reproductive mode, life history and genome size. New Phytol. 214, 879–889 (2017).
Google Scholar
Vieira, M. L. C. et al. Revisiting meiosis in sugarcane: chromosomal irregularities and the prevalence of bivalent configurations. Front. Genet. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00213 (2018).
Google Scholar
Oliveira, B. et al. New trends in sugarcane fertilization: Implications for NH3 volatilization, N2O emissions and crop yields. J. Environ. Manage. 342, 118233 (2023).
Google Scholar
Price, S. Chromosome numbers in interspecific hybrids. Bot. Gaz. 118, 146–159 (1957).
Google Scholar
Chai, J. et al. All nonhomologous chromosomes and rearrangements in Saccharum officinarum × Saccharum spontaneum allopolyploids identified by oligo-based painting. Front. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1176914 (2023).
Google Scholar
Higgins, J. et al. Unravelling mechanisms that govern meiotic crossover formation in wheat. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 50, 1179–1186 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wenger, A. M. et al. Accurate circular consensus long-read sequencing improves variant detection and assembly of a human genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1155–1162 (2019).
Google Scholar
Burton, J. N. et al. Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1119–1125 (2013).
Google Scholar
Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cheng, H. et al. Efficient near-telomere-to-telomere assembly of nanopore simplex reads. Nature 655, 166–173 (2026).
Google Scholar
Cheng, H., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X., Zhang, H. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods 18, 170–175 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zeng, X. et al. Chromosome-level scaffolding of haplotype-resolved assemblies using Hi-C data without reference genomes. Nat. Plants 10, 1184–1200 (2024).
Google Scholar
Durand, N. et al. Juicebox provides a visualization system for Hi-C contact maps with unlimited zoom. Cell Syst. 3, 99–101 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, A., Gao, M. & Chong, Z. Accurate long-read de novo assembly evaluation with Inspector. Genome Biol. 22, 312 (2021).
Google Scholar
Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210–3212 (2015).
Google Scholar
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
Google Scholar
Ou, S., Chen, J. & Jiang, N. Assessing genome assembly quality using the LTR Assembly Index (LAI). Nucleic Acids Res. 46, e126 (2018).
Google Scholar
Pedersen, B. S. & Quinlan, A. R. Mosdepth: quick coverage calculation for genomes and exomes. Bioinformatics 34, 867–868 (2018).
Google Scholar
Krzywinski, M. et al. CIRCOS: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 19, 1639–1645 (2009).
Google Scholar
Tang, H. et al. JCVI: A versatile toolkit for comparative genomics analysis. iMeta 3, e211 (2024).
Google Scholar
Marcais, G. et al. MUMmer4: a fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1005944 (2018).
Google Scholar
Flynn, J. M. et al. RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9451–9457 (2020).
Google Scholar
Li, Y., Jiang, N. & Sun, Y. AnnoSINE: a short interspersed nuclear elements annotation tool for plant genomes. Plant Physiol. 188, 955–970 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rho, M. & Tang, H. MGEScan-non-LTR: computational identification and classification of autonomous non-LTR retrotransposons in eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, e143–e143 (2009).
Google Scholar
Ou, S. et al. Benchmarking transposable element annotation methods for creation of a streamlined, comprehensive pipeline. Genome Biol. 20, 275 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhang, R.-G. et al. TEsorter: an accurate and fast method to classify LTR-retrotransposons in plant genomes. Hortic. Res. 9, uhac017 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yan, H., Bombarely, A. & Li, S. DeepTE: a computational method for de novo classification of transposons with convolutional neural network. Bioinformatics 36, 4269–4275 (2020).
Google Scholar
Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010).
Google Scholar
Tarailo-Graovac, M. & Chen, N. Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 4, 4.10.11–14.10.14 (2009).
Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 573–580 (1999).
Google Scholar
Lin, Y. et al. quarTeT: a telomere-to-telomere toolkit for gap-free genome assembly and centromeric repeat identification. Hortic. Res. 10, uhad127 (2023).
Google Scholar
Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1494–1512 (2013).
Google Scholar
Kim, D., Paggi, J. M., Park, C., Bennett, C. & Salzberg, S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 907–915 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gabriel, L. et al. BRAKER3: Fully automated genome annotation using RNA-seq and protein evidence with GeneMark-ETP, AUGUSTUS, and TSEBRA. Genome Res. 34, 769–777 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gabriel, L., Hoff, K., Bruna, T., Borodovsky, M. & Stanke, M. TSEBRA: transcript selector for BRAKER. BMC Bioinformatics 22, 566 (2021).
Google Scholar
Holst, F. et al. ab initio prediction of primary eukaryotic gene models combining deep learning and a hidden Markov model. Nat. Methods 23, 732–739 (2026).
Google Scholar
Haas, B. et al. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the program to assemble spliced alignments. Genome Biol. 9, R7 (2008).
Google Scholar
Blum, M. et al. The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D344–D354 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cantalapiedra, C. P., Hernández-Plaza, A., Letunic, I., Bork, P. & Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 5825–5829 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e49 (2012).
Google Scholar
Wu, T. D. & Watanabe, C. K. GMAP: a genomic mapping and alignment program for mRNA and EST sequences. Bioinformatics 21, 1859–1875 (2005).
Google Scholar
Edgar, R. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5, 113 (2004).
Google Scholar
Bailey, T. L. STREME: accurate and versatile sequence motif discovery. Bioinformatics 37, 2834–2840 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jiao, W.-B. & Schneeberger, K. Chromosome-level assemblies of multiple Arabidopsis genomes reveal hotspots of rearrangements with altered evolutionary dynamics. Nat. Commun. 11, 989 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ono, Y., Hamada, M. & Asai, K. PBSIM3: a simulator for all types of PacBio and ONT long reads. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 4, lqac092 (2022).
Google Scholar
Baid, G. et al. DeepConsensus improves the accuracy of sequences with a gap-aware sequence transformer. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 232–238 (2023).
Google Scholar
CNCB–NGDC Members and Partners. Database resources of the National Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation in 2026. Nucleic Acids Res. 54, D28–D47 (2026).
Google Scholar
Tang, H. KLASSIFY: classify chimeric reads based on unique k-mer contents (Version 0.1.6) [Computer software]. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20838810 (2026).
Keep following us for the latest insights.
