Shor, P. W. Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory. Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493(R)–R2496(R) (1995). Article ADS Google Scholar Steane, A. M. Overhead and noise threshold of fault-tolerant quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. A 68, 042322 (2003). Article ADS Google Scholar Google Quantum AI and Collaborators. Quantum error correction below the surface code
Shor, P. W. Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory. Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493(R)–R2496(R) (1995).
Google Scholar
Steane, A. M. Overhead and noise threshold of fault-tolerant quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. A 68, 042322 (2003).
Google Scholar
Google Quantum AI and Collaborators. Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold. Nature 638, 920–926 (2025).
Google Scholar
Google Quantum AI and Collaborators.Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit. Nature 614, 676–681 (2023).
Google Scholar
Grassl, M., Beth, T. & Pellizzari, T. Codes for the quantum erasure channel. Phys. Rev. A 56, 33–38 (1997).
Google Scholar
Kubica, A. et al. Erasure qubits: overcoming the T1 limit in superconducting circuits. Phys. Rev. X 13, 041022 (2023).
Google Scholar
Teoh, J. D. et al. Dual-rail encoding with superconducting cavities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2221736120 (2023).
Google Scholar
Xu, Q. et al. Tailored XZZX codes for biased noise. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013035 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sahay, K., Jin, J., Claes, J., Thompson, J. D. & Puri, S. High-threshold codes for neutral-atom qubits with biased erasure errors. Phys. Rev. X 13, 041013 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wu, Y., Kolkowitz, S., Puri, S. & Thompson, J. D. Erasure conversion for fault-tolerant quantum computing in alkaline earth Rydberg atom arrays. Nat. Commun. 13, 4657 (2022).
Google Scholar
Aliferis, P. & Preskill, J. Fault-tolerant quantum computation against biased noise. Phys. Rev. A 78, 052331 (2008).
Google Scholar
Barrett, S. D. & Stace, T. M. Fault tolerant quantum computation with very high threshold for loss errors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 200502 (2010).
Google Scholar
Delfosse, N. & Zémor, G. Linear-time maximum likelihood decoding of surface codes over the quantum erasure channel. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033042 (2020).
Google Scholar
Preskill, J. Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
Google Scholar
Puri, S., Boutin, S. & Blais, A. Engineering the quantum states of light in a Kerr-nonlinear resonator by two-photon driving. npj Quantum Inf. 3, 18 (2017).
Google Scholar
Puri, S. et al. Bias-preserving gates with stabilized cat qubits. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay5901 (2020).
Google Scholar
Grimm, A. et al. Stabilization and operation of a Kerr-cat qubit. Nature 584, 205–209 (2020).
Google Scholar
Putterman, H. et al. Hardware-efficient quantum error correction via concatenated bosonic qubits. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08642-7 (2025).
Mirrahimi, M. et al. Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation. New J. Phys. 16, 045014 (2014).
Google Scholar
Leghtas, Z. et al. Confining the state of light to a quantum manifold by engineered two-photon loss. Science 347, 853–857 (2015).
Google Scholar
Tuckett, D. K. et al. Tailoring surface codes for highly biased noise. Phys. Rev. X 9, 041031 (2019).
Google Scholar
Tuckett, D. K., Bartlett, S. D., Flammia, S. T. & Brown, B. J. Fault-tolerant thresholds for the surface code in excess of 5% under biased noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 130501 (2020).
Google Scholar
Darmawan, A. S., Brown, B. J., Grimsmo, A. L., Tuckett, D. K. & Puri, S. Practical quantum error correction with the XZZX code and Kerr-Cat qubits. PRX Quantum 2, 030345 (2021).
Google Scholar
Claes, J., Bourassa, J. E. & Puri, S. Tailored cluster states with high threshold under biased noise. npj Quantum Inf. 9, 9 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chuang, I. L. & Yamamoto, Y. Simple quantum computer. Phys. Rev. A 52, 3489–3496 (1995).
Google Scholar
Chuang, I. L. & Yamamoto, Y. Quantum bit regeneration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4281–4284 (1996).
Google Scholar
Knill, E., Laflamme, R. & Milburn, G. J. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature 409, 46–52 (2001).
Google Scholar
Slussarenko, S. & Pryde, G. J. Photonic quantum information processing: a concise review. Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 041303 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ma, S. et al. High-fidelity gates and mid-circuit erasure conversion in an atomic qubit. Nature 622, 279–284 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kang, M., Campbell, W. C. & Brown, K. R. Quantum error correction with metastable states of trapped ions using erasure conversion. PRX Quantum 4, 020358 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gu, S., Vaknin, Y., Retzker, A. & Kubica, A. Optimizing quantum error-correction protocols with erasure qubits. PRX Quantum https://doi.org/10.1103/985g-58gd (2025).
Shim, Y.-P. & Tahan, C. Semiconductor-inspired design principles for superconducting quantum computing. Nat. Commun. 7, 11059 (2016).
Google Scholar
Campbell, D. L. et al. Universal nonadiabatic control of small-gap superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. X 10, 041051 (2020).
Google Scholar
Levine, H. et al. Demonstrating a long-coherence dual-rail erasure qubit using tunable transmons. Phys. Rev. X 14, 011051 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zakka-Bajjani, E. et al. Quantum superposition of a single microwave photon in two different ‘colour’ states Nat. Phys. 7, 599–603 (2011).
Google Scholar
Chou, K. S. et al. A superconducting dual-rail cavity qubit with erasure-detected logical measurements. Nat. Phys. 20, 1454–1460 (2024).
Google Scholar
Chapman, B. J. et al. High-on-off-ratio beam-splitter interaction for gates on bosonically encoded qubits. PRX Quantum 4, 020355 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lu, Y. et al. High-fidelity parametric beamsplitting with a parity-protected converter. Nat. Commun. 14, 5767 (2023).
Google Scholar
Koottandavida, A. et al. Erasure detection of a dual-rail qubit encoded in a double-post superconducting cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 180601 (2024).
Google Scholar
de Graaf, S. J. et al. A mid-circuit erasure check on a dual-rail cavity qubit using the joint-photon number-splitting regime of circuit QED. npj Quantum Inf. 11, 1 (2025).
Google Scholar
Rosenblum, S. et al. A CNOT gate between multiphoton qubits encoded in two cavities. Nat. Commun. 9, 652 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rosenblum, S. et al. Fault-tolerant detection of a quantum error. Science 361, 266–270 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y.-H. & Baldwin, C. H. Randomized benchmarking with leakage errors. Phys. Rev. Res. https://doi.org/10.1103/j8sz-6ws9 (2025).
Wood, C. J. & Gambetta, J. M. Quantification and characterization of leakage errors. Phys. Rev. A 97, 032306 (2018).
Google Scholar
Huang, W. et al. Logical multi-qubit entanglement with dual-rail superconducting qubits. Nat. Phys. 22, 591–597 (2026).
Google Scholar
Korotkov, A. N. Error matrices in quantum process tomography. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/1309.6405 (2013).
Gidney, C. Stim: a fast stabilizer circuit simulator. Quantum 5, 497 (2021).
Google Scholar
Baranes, G. et al. Leveraging qubit loss detection in fault-tolerant quantum algorithms. Phys. Rev. X 16, 011002 (2026).
Google Scholar
For more tech updates, stay tuned to our blog.
