Lan, X., Thoning, K. W. & Dlugokencky, E. J. Trends in globally averaged CH4, N2O, and SF6 determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory measurements. https://doi.org/10.15138/P8XG-AA10 (NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, 2026). Kirschke, S. et al. Three decades of global methane sources and sinks. Nat. Geosci. 6, 813–823 (2013). Article ADS CAS Google Scholar Intergovernmental Panel on
Lan, X., Thoning, K. W. & Dlugokencky, E. J. Trends in globally averaged CH4, N2O, and SF6 determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory measurements. https://doi.org/10.15138/P8XG-AA10 (NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, 2026).
Kirschke, S. et al. Three decades of global methane sources and sinks. Nat. Geosci. 6, 813–823 (2013).
Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2023).
Saunois, M. et al. The global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 1561–1623 (2020).
Google Scholar
Aydin, M. et al. Recent decreases in fossil-fuel emissions of ethane and methane derived from firn air. Nature 476, 198–201 (2011).
Google Scholar
Simpson, I. J. et al. Long-term decline of global atmospheric ethane concentrations and implications for methane. Nature 488, 490–494 (2012).
Google Scholar
Schaefer, H. et al. A 21st-century shift from fossil-fuel to biogenic methane emissions indicated by 13CH4. Science 352, 80–84 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ghosh, J. in The World Economy through the Lens of the United Nations (eds Ocampo, J. A. et al.) 170–201 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198817345.003.0007 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018).
Skeie, R. B., Hodnebrog, Ø. & Myhre, G. Trends in atmospheric methane concentrations since 1990 were driven and modified by anthropogenic emissions. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 317 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bousquet, P. et al. Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability. Nature 443, 439–443 (2006).
Google Scholar
Turner, A. J., Frankenberg, C., Wennberg, P. O. & Jacob, D. J. Ambiguity in the causes for decadal trends in atmospheric methane and hydroxyl. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5367–5372 (2017).
Google Scholar
McNorton, J. et al. Role of OH variability in the stalling of the global atmospheric CH4 growth rate from 1999 to 2006. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 7943–7956 (2016).
Google Scholar
Rigby, M. et al. Role of atmospheric oxidation in recent methane growth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5373–5377 (2017).
Google Scholar
McDuffie, E. E. et al. A global anthropogenic emission inventory of atmospheric pollutants from sector- and fuel-specific sources (1970–2017): an application of the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 3413–3442 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hoesly, R. M. et al. Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS). Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 369–408 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kim, S.-W. et al. Satellite-observed U.S. power plant NOx emission reductions and their impact on air quality. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L22812 (2006).
Google Scholar
Vestreng, V. et al. Evolution of NOx emissions in Europe with focus on road transport control measures. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 1503–1520 (2009).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Tropospheric ozone change from 1980 to 2010 dominated by equatorward redistribution of emissions. Nat. Geosci. 9, 875–879 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bates, K. H. & Jacob, D. J. A new model mechanism for atmospheric oxidation of isoprene: global effects on oxidants, nitrogen oxides, organic products, and secondary organic aerosol. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 9613–9640 (2019).
Google Scholar
Naus, S. et al. Constraints and biases in a tropospheric two-box model of OH. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 407–424 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rigby, M. et al. Re-evaluation of the lifetimes of the major CFCs and CH3CCl3 using atmospheric trends. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 2691–2702 (2013).
Google Scholar
Montzka, S. A. et al. Small interannual variability of global atmospheric hydroxyl. Science 331, 67–69 (2011).
Google Scholar
Patra, P. K. et al. Methyl chloroform continues to constrain the hydroxyl (OH) variability in the troposphere. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 126, e2020JD033862 (2021).
Google Scholar
Verschuur, J., Koks, E. E. & Hall, J. W. Ports’ criticality in international trade and global supply-chains. Nat. Commun. 13, 4351 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, X.-T. et al. Trade-linked shipping CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 945–951 (2021).
Google Scholar
Johnson, C., Henshaw, J. & McInnes, G. Impact of aircraft and surface emissions of nitrogen oxides on tropospheric ozone and global warming. Nature 355, 69–71 (1992).
Google Scholar
Stevens, P. S. et al. HO2/OH and RO2/HO2 ratios during the tropospheric OH photochemistry experiment: measurement and theory. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 102, 6379–6391 (1997).
Google Scholar
Hoor, P. et al. The impact of traffic emissions on atmospheric ozone and OH: results from QUANTIFY. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 3113–3136 (2009).
Google Scholar
Rice, A. L. et al. Atmospheric methane isotopic record favors fossil sources flat in 1980s and 1990s with recent increase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.USA 113, 10791–10796 (2016).
Google Scholar
Fujita, R. et al. Global and regional CH4 emissions for 1995–2013 derived from atmospheric CH4, δ13C–CH4, and δD-CH4 observations and a chemical transport model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 125, e2020JD032903 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chandra, N. et al. Methane emissions decreased in fossil fuel exploitation and sustainably increased in microbial source sectors during 1990–2020. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 147 (2024).
Google Scholar
Peng, S. et al. Inventory of anthropogenic methane emissions in mainland China from 1980 to 2010. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 14545–14562 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chandra, N. et al. Emissions from the oil and gas sectors, coal mining and ruminant farming drive methane growth over the past three decades. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn 99, 309–337 (2021).
Google Scholar
Crippa, M. et al. Insights into the spatial distribution of global, national, and subnational greenhouse gas emissions in the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR v8.0). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 16, 2811–2830 (2024).
Google Scholar
Höglund-Isaksson, L. Global anthropogenic methane emissions 2005–2030: technical mitigation potentials and costs. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 9079–9096 (2012).
Google Scholar
Prather, M. J., Holmes, C. D. & Hsu, J. Reactive greenhouse gas scenarios: systematic exploration of uncertainties and the role of atmospheric chemistry. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L09803 (2012).
Google Scholar
Sindelarova, K. et al. Global data set of biogenic VOC emissions calculated by the MEGAN model over the last 30 years. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 9317–9341 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wang, H., Liu, X., Wu, C. & Lin, G. Regional to global distributions, trends, and drivers of biogenic volatile organic compound emission from 2001 to 2020. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 24, 3309–3328 (2024).
Google Scholar
Crippa, M. et al. Gridded emissions of air pollutants for the period 1970–2012 within EDGAR v4.3.2. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 1987–2013 (2018).
Google Scholar
Crippa, M. et al. High resolution temporal profiles in the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research. Sci. Data 7, 121 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shen, L. et al. A machine-learning-guided adaptive algorithm to reduce the computational cost of integrating kinetics in global atmospheric chemistry models: application to GEOS-Chem versions 12.0.0 and 12.9.1. Geosci. Model Dev. 15, 1677–1687 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fisher, J. A. et al. Methyl, ethyl, and propyl nitrates: global distribution and impacts on reactive nitrogen in remote marine environments. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 123, 12429–12451 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. The role of chlorine in global tropospheric chemistry. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 3981–4003 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gelaro, R. et al. The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2). J. Clim. 30, 5419–5454 (2017).
Google Scholar
van der Werf, G. R. et al. Landscape fire emissions from the 5th version of the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED5). Sci. Data 12, 1870 (2025).
Google Scholar
Murray, L. T., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., Hudman, R. C. & Koshak, W. J. Optimized regional and interannual variability of lightning in a global chemical transport model constrained by LIS/OTD satellite data. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 117, D20307 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hudman, R. C. et al. Steps towards a mechanistic model of global soil nitric oxide emissions: implementation and space based-constraints. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 7779–7795 (2012).
Google Scholar
Guenther, A. et al. Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 3181–3210 (2006).
Google Scholar
Krol, M. & Lelieveld, J. Can the variability in tropospheric OH be deduced from measurements of 1,1,1-trichloroethane (methyl chloroform)? J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 108, 4125 (2003).
Google Scholar
Bousquet, P., Hauglustaine, D. A., Peylin, P., Carouge, C. & Ciais, P. Two decades of OH variability as inferred by an inversion of atmospheric transport and chemistry of methyl chloroform. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5, 2635–2656 (2005).
Google Scholar
Prinn, R. G. et al. Evidence for variability of atmospheric hydroxyl radicals over the past quarter century. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L07809 (2005).
Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. et al. Reconciling the bottom-up and top-down estimates of the methane chemical sink using multiple observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 23, 789–807 (2023).
Google Scholar
Naik, V. et al. Preindustrial to present-day changes in tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 5277–5298 (2013).
Google Scholar
Liu, M. et al. Enhanced atmospheric oxidation toward carbon neutrality reduces methane’s climate forcing. Nat. Commun. 15, 3148 (2024).
Google Scholar
Holmes, C. D., Prather, M. J., Søvde, O. A. & Myhre, G. Future methane, hydroxyl, and their uncertainties: key climate and emission parameters for future predictions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 285–302 (2013).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Contributions of world regions to the global tropospheric ozone burden change from 1980 to 2010. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL089184 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lassey, K. R., Lowe, D. C. & Manning, M. R. The trend in atmospheric methane δ13C and implications for isotopic constraints on the global methane budget. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 14, 41–49 (2000).
Google Scholar
Lassey, K. R., Etheridge, D. M., Lowe, D. C., Smith, A. M. & Ferretti, D. F. Centennial evolution of the atmospheric methane budget: what do the carbon isotopes tell us? Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7, 2119–2139 (2007).
Google Scholar
Lan, X. et al. Improved constraints on global methane emissions and sinks using δ13C–CH4. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 35, e2021GB007000 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Q.-L. & Li, W.-J. A calibrated measurement of the atomic weight of carbon. Chin. Sci. Bull. 35, 290–296 (1990).
Google Scholar
Saunois, M. et al. Global methane budget 2000–2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 17, 1873–1958 (2025).
Google Scholar
Fung, I. et al. Three-dimensional model synthesis of the global methane cycle. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 96, 13033–13065 (1991).
Google Scholar
Murguia-Flores, F., Arndt, S., Ganesan, A. L., Murray-Tortarolo, G. & Hornibrook, E. R. C. Soil Methanotrophy Model (MeMo v1.0): a process-based model to quantify global uptake of atmospheric methane by soil. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 2009–2032 (2018).
Google Scholar
Schwietzke, S. et al. Upward revision of global fossil fuel methane emissions based on isotope database. Nature 538, 88–91 (2016).
Google Scholar
Riddell-Young, B. et al. Microbial driver of 2006–2023 CH4 growth indicated by trends in atmospheric δD–CH4 and δ13C–CH4. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2516543122 (2025).
Google Scholar
Cantrell, C. A. et al. Carbon kinetic isotope effect in the oxidation of methane by the hydroxyl radical. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 95, 22455–22462 (1990).
Google Scholar
Saueressig, G. et al. Carbon 13 and D kinetic isotope effects in the reactions of CH4 with O(1D) and OH: new laboratory measurements and their implications for the isotopic composition of stratospheric methane. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 106, 23127–23138 (2001).
Google Scholar
Saueressig, G., Bergamaschi, P., Crowley, J. N., Fischer, H. & Harris, G. W. Carbon kinetic isotope effect in the reaction of CH4 with Cl atoms. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 1225–1228 (1995).
Google Scholar
Hein, R., Crutzen, P. J. & Heimann, M. An inverse modeling approach to investigate the global atmospheric methane cycle. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 11, 43–76 (1997).
Google Scholar
Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Lowe, D. C., Manning, M. R., Sparks, R. J. & van Velthoven, P. F. J. The 13C, 14C, and 18O isotopic composition of CO, CH4, and CO2 in the higher southern latitudes lower stratosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 100, 26163–26172 (1995).
Google Scholar
King, S. L., Quay, P. D. & Lansdown, J. M. The 13C/12C kinetic isotope effect for soil oxidation of methane at ambient atmospheric concentrations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 94, 18273–18277 (1989).
Google Scholar
Oh, Y. et al. Improved global wetland carbon isotopic signatures support post-2006 microbial methane emission increase. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 159 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chang, J. et al. Revisiting enteric methane emissions from domestic ruminants and their δ13CCH4 source signature. Nat. Commun. 10, 3420 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhu, Y. et al. Data for Atmospheric CH4 plateau sustained by NOx emission rise and southward shift. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21486324 (2026).
For more tech updates, stay tuned to our blog.
