Radzicka, A. & Wolfenden, R. Rates of uncatalyzed peptide bond hydrolysis in neutral solution and the transition state affinities of proteases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 6105–6109 (1996). Article ADS CAS Google Scholar Dyer, R. P. & Weiss, G. A. Making the cut with protease engineering. Cell Chem. Biol. 29, 177–190 (2022). Article CAS PubMed
Radzicka, A. & Wolfenden, R. Rates of uncatalyzed peptide bond hydrolysis in neutral solution and the transition state affinities of proteases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 6105–6109 (1996).
Google Scholar
Dyer, R. P. & Weiss, G. A. Making the cut with protease engineering. Cell Chem. Biol. 29, 177–190 (2022).
Google Scholar
Otto, H.-H. & Schirmeister, T. Cysteine proteases and their inhibitors. Chem. Rev. 97, 133–172 (1997).
Google Scholar
Carter, P. & Wells, J. A. Dissecting the catalytic triad of a serine protease. Nature 332, 564–568 (1988.
Google Scholar
Ménard, R. et al. Modification of the electrostatic environment is tolerated in the oxyanion hole of the cysteine protease papain. Biochemistry 34, 464–471 (1995).
Google Scholar
Verma, S., Dixit, R. & Pandey, K. C. Cysteine proteases: modes of activation and future prospects as pharmacological targets. Front. Pharmacol. 7, 107 (2016).
Google Scholar
Lauko, A. et al. Computational design of serine hydrolases. Science 388, eadu2454 (2025).
Google Scholar
Kim, D. et al. Computational design of metallohydrolases. Nature 649, 246–253 (2026).
Ahern, W. et al. Atom-level enzyme active site scaffolding using RFdiffusion2. Nat. Methods 23, 96–105 (2026).
Google Scholar
Bauer, M. S. et al. De novo design of phospho-tyrosine peptide binders. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.29.678898 (2025).
Mossessova, E. & Lima, C. D. Ulp1-SUMO crystal structure and genetic analysis reveal conserved interactions and a regulatory element essential for cell growth in yeast. Mol. Cell 5, 865–876 (2000).
Google Scholar
Dauparas, J. et al. Robust deep learning-based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN. Science 378, 49–56 (2022).
Google Scholar
Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bindels, D. S. et al. mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging. Nat. Methods 14, 53–56 (2017).
Google Scholar
Matayoshi, E. D., Wang, G. T., Krafft, G. A. & Erickson, J. Novel fluorogenic substrates for assaying retroviral proteases by resonance energy transfer. Science 247, 954–958 (1990).
Google Scholar
Hofer, F., Kraml, J., Kahler, U., Kamenik, A. S. & Liedl, K. R. Catalytic site pKa values of aspartic, cysteine, and Serine proteases: Constant pH MD simulations. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 3030–3042 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhai, X. & Meek, T. D. Catalytic mechanism of cruzain from Trypanosoma cruzi as determined from solvent kinetic isotope effects of steady-state and pre-steady-state kinetics. Biochemistry 57, 3176–3190 (2018).
Google Scholar
Daniel, R. M. & Danson, M. J. A new understanding of how temperature affects the catalytic activity of enzymes. Trends Biochem. Sci 35, 584–591 (2010).
Google Scholar
Xu, Z. et al. Molecular basis of the redox regulation of SUMO proteases: a protective mechanism of intermolecular disulfide linkage against irreversible sulfhydryl oxidation. FASEB J. 22, 127–137 (2008).
Google Scholar
van Kempen, M. et al. Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 243–246 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. & Skolnick, J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 57, 702–710 (2004).
Google Scholar
Anishchenko, I. et al. Modeling protein-small molecule conformational ensembles with PLACER. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2427161122 (2025).
Google Scholar
LaLonde, J. M. et al. Use of papain as a model for the structure-based design of cathepsin K inhibitors: crystal structures of two papain-inhibitor complexes demonstrate binding to S′-subsites. J. Med. Chem. 41, 4567–4576 (1998).
Google Scholar
Tsuge, H. et al. Inhibition mechanism of cathepsin L-specific inhibitors based on the crystal structure of papain-CLIK148 complex. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 266, 411–416 (1999).
Google Scholar
Moldoveanu, T., Campbell, R. L., Cuerrier, D. & Davies, P. L. Crystal structures of calpain-E64 and -leupeptin inhibitor complexes reveal mobile loops gating the active site. J. Mol. Biol. 343, 1313–1326 (2004).
Google Scholar
Falke, S. et al. Structural elucidation and antiviral activity of covalent cathepsin L inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 67, 7048–7067 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yamamoto, A. et al. Structural basis for development of cathepsin B-specific noncovalent-type inhibitor: crystal structure of cathepsin B-E64c complex. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1597, 244–251 (2002).
Google Scholar
Pauly, T. A. et al. Specificity determinants of human cathepsin s revealed by crystal structures of complexes. Biochemistry 42, 3203–3213 (2003).
Google Scholar
Huang, L., Brinen, L. S. & Ellman, J. A. Crystal structures of reversible ketone-Based inhibitors of the cysteine protease cruzain. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 11, 21–29 (2003).
Google Scholar
Kapust, R. B. et al. Tobacco etch virus protease: mechanism of autolysis and rational design of stable mutants with wild-type catalytic proficiency. Protein Eng. 14, 993–1000 (2001).
Google Scholar
Kenneson, J. R. et al. Exploring possible drug-resistant variants of SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) with noncovalent preclinical candidate, Mpro61. ACS Bio Med Chem Au 5, 215–226 (2025).
Google Scholar
Mei, M. et al. A combinatorial strategy for HRV 3C protease engineering to achieve the N-terminal free cleavage. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 265, 131066 (2024).
Google Scholar
Pearlman, D. A. et al. AMBER, a package of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules. Comput. Phys. Commun. 91, 1–41 (1995).
Google Scholar
Shaffer, J. M. & Greenwald, I. SALSA, a genetically encoded biosensor for spatiotemporal quantification of Notch signal transduction in vivo. Dev. Cell 57, 930–944.e6 (2022).
Gao, X. J., Chong, L. S., Kim, M. S. & Elowitz, M. B. Programmable protein circuits in living cells. Science 361, 1252–1258 (2018).
Google Scholar
Roybal, K. T. et al. Engineering T cells with customized therapeutic response programs using synthetic Notch receptors. Cell 167, 419–432 (2016).
Google Scholar
Barnea, G. et al. The genetic design of signaling cascades to record receptor activation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 64–69 (2008).
Google Scholar
Coukos, R. et al. An engineered transcriptional reporter of protein localization identifies regulators of mitochondrial and ER membrane protein trafficking in high-throughput CRISPRi screens. eLife 10, e69142 (2021).
Google Scholar
Novinec, M. & Lenarčič, B. Papain-like peptidases: structure, function, and evolution. Biomol. Concepts 4, 287–308 (2013).
Google Scholar
Hekkelman, M. L., Salmoral, D. Á, Perrakis, A. & Joosten, R. P. DSSP 4: FAIR annotation of protein secondary structure. Protein Sci. 34, e70208 (2025).
Google Scholar
Bennett, N. R. et al. Improving de novo protein binder design with deep learning. Nat. Commun. 14, 2625 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kuo, C.-J., Chi, Y.-H., Hsu, J. T.-A. & Liang, P.-H. Characterization of SARS main protease and inhibitor assay using a fluorogenic substrate. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 318, 862–867 (2004).
Google Scholar
Kabsch, W. Integration, scaling, space-group assignment and post-refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 133–144 (2010).
Google Scholar
Winn, M. D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 235–242 (2011).
Google Scholar
McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).
Google Scholar
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. In International Tables for Crystallography 539–547 (International Union of Crystallography, 2012).
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
Google Scholar
Williams, C. J. et al. MolProbity: more and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 27, 293–315 (2018).
Google Scholar
Keep following us for the latest insights.
