Li, Y.-R., Zhu, Y., Halladay, T. & Yang, L. In vivo CAR engineering for immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 25, 725–744 (2025). Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar Zebley, C. C. & Youngblood, B. Mechanisms of T cell exhaustion guiding next-generation immunotherapy. Trends Cancer 8, 726–734 (2022). Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar Kirchhammer, N., Trefny,
Li, Y.-R., Zhu, Y., Halladay, T. & Yang, L. In vivo CAR engineering for immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 25, 725–744 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zebley, C. C. & Youngblood, B. Mechanisms of T cell exhaustion guiding next-generation immunotherapy. Trends Cancer 8, 726–734 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kirchhammer, N., Trefny, M. P., Auf der Maur, P., Läubli, H. & Zippelius, A. Combination cancer immunotherapies: emerging treatment strategies adapted to the tumor microenvironment. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabo3605 (2022).
Google Scholar
Patel, U. et al. CAR T cell therapy in solid tumors: a review of current clinical trials. eJHaem 3, 24–31 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wei, J. et al. Targeting REGNASE-1 programs long-lived effector T cells for cancer therapy. Nature 576, 471–476 (2019).
Google Scholar
Carnevale, J. et al. RASA2 ablation in T cells boosts antigen sensitivity and long-term function. Nature 609, 174–182 (2022).
Google Scholar
Freitas, K. A. et al. Enhanced T cell effector activity by targeting the Mediator kinase module. Science 378, eabn5647 (2022).
Google Scholar
Arce, M. M. et al. Central control of dynamic gene circuits governs T cell rest and activation. Nature 637, 930–939 (2025).
Google Scholar
Agarwal, S. et al. Deletion of the inhibitory co-receptor CTLA-4 enhances and invigorates chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Immunity 56, 2388–2407.e9 (2023).
Google Scholar
Rowshanravan, B., Halliday, N. & Sansom, D. M. CTLA-4: a moving target in immunotherapy. Blood 131, 58–67 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sharpe, A. H. & Pauken, K. E. The diverse functions of the PD1 inhibitory pathway. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18, 153–167 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sitaram, P., Uyemura, B., Malarkannan, S. & Riese, M. J. Beyond the cell surface: targeting intracellular negative regulators to enhance T cell anti-tumor activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 5821 (2019).
Google Scholar
Liu, X. et al. Genome-wide analysis identifies NR4A1 as a key mediator of T cell dysfunction. Nature 567, 525–529 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chen, J. et al. NR4A transcription factors limit CAR T cell function in solid tumours. Nature 567, 530–534 (2019).
Google Scholar
Seo, H. et al. TOX and TOX2 transcription factors cooperate with NR4A transcription factors to impose CD8+ T cell exhaustion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 12410–12415 (2019).
Google Scholar
Henriksson, J. et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screens in T helper cells reveal pervasive crosstalk between activation and differentiation. Cell 176, 882–896.e18 (2019).
Google Scholar
Shifrut, E. et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screens in primary human T cells reveal key regulators of immune function. Cell 175, 1958–1971.e15 (2018).
Google Scholar
Shi, H., Doench, J. G. & Chi, H. CRISPR screens for functional interrogation of immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 23, 363–380 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhou, L., Yang, L., Feng, Y. & Chen, S. Pooled screening with next-generation gene editing tools. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 28, 100479 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Renauer, P. A., Zhou, L., Fang, S.-Y. & Chen, S. Applications of CRISPR technology in cellular immunotherapy. Immunol. Rev. 320, 199–216 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dong, M. B. et al. Systematic immunotherapy target discovery using genome-scale in vivo CRISPR screens in CD8 T cells. Cell 178, 1189–1204.e23 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ye, L. et al. In vivo CRISPR screening in CD8 T cells with AAV–Sleeping Beauty hybrid vectors identifies membrane targets for improving immunotherapy for glioblastoma. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1302–1313 (2019).
Google Scholar
Dai, X. et al. Massively parallel knock-in engineering of human T cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1239–1255 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, Z. et al. In vivo CD8+ T cell CRISPR screening reveals control by Fli1 in infection and cancer. Cell 184, 1262–1280.e22 (2021).
Google Scholar
Huang, H. et al. In vivo CRISPR screening reveals nutrient signaling processes underpinning CD8+ T cell fate decisions. Cell 184, 1245–1261.e21 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fu, G. et al. Metabolic control of TFH cells and humoral immunity by phosphatidylethanolamine. Nature 595, 724–729 (2021).
Google Scholar
Guo, A. et al. cBAF complex components and MYC cooperate early in CD8+ T cell fate. Nature 607, 135–141 (2022).
Google Scholar
Shen, J. P. et al. Combinatorial CRISPR-Cas9 screens for de novo mapping of genetic interactions. Nat. Methods 14, 573–576 (2017).
Google Scholar
Chow, R. D. et al. In vivo profiling of metastatic double knockouts through CRISPR-Cpf1 screens. Nat. Methods 16, 405–408 (2019).
Google Scholar
Campa, C. C., Weisbach, N. R., Santinha, A. J., Incarnato, D. & Platt, R. J. Multiplexed genome engineering by Cas12a and CRISPR arrays encoded on single transcripts. Nat. Methods 16, 887–893 (2019).
Google Scholar
Li, R. et al. Comparative optimization of combinatorial CRISPR screens. Nat. Commun. 13, 2469 (2022).
Google Scholar
Tang, S. et al. Generation of dual-gRNA library for combinatorial CRISPR screening of synthetic lethal gene pairs. STAR Protoc. 3, 101556 (2022).
Google Scholar
Prinzing, B. et al. Deleting DNMT3A in CAR T cells prevents exhaustion and enhances antitumor activity. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eabh0272 (2021).
Google Scholar
LaFleur, M. W. et al. PTPN2 regulates the generation of exhausted CD8+ T cell subpopulations and restrains tumor immunity. Nat. Immunol. 20, 1335–1347 (2019).
Google Scholar
Aki, D. et al. The E3 ligases Itch and WWP2 cooperate to limit TH2 differentiation by enhancing signaling through the TCR. Nat. Immunol. 19, 766–775 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nurieva, R. I. et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase GRAIL regulates T cell tolerance and regulatory T cell function by mediating T cell receptor-CD3 degradation. Immunity 32, 670–680 (2010).
Google Scholar
Huang, C.-Y. et al. DUSP4 deficiency enhances CD25 expression and CD4+ T-cell proliferation without impeding T-cell development. Eur. J. Immunol. 42, 476–488 (2012).
Google Scholar
Dashevsky, O. et al. Use of olfactory receptor genes as controls for genome-scale CRISPR functional genomic studies to define treatment resistance mechanisms. Blood 136, 36 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhao, D. et al. Combinatorial CRISPR-Cas9 metabolic screens reveal critical redox control points dependent on the KEAP1-NRF2 regulatory axis. Mol. Cell 69, 699–708.e7 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yang, L. et al. OR7A10 GPCR engineering boosts CAR-NK therapy against solid tumours. Nature 652, 740–751 (2026).
Google Scholar
Rosskopf, S. et al. A Jurkat 76 based triple parameter reporter system to evaluate TCR functions and adoptive T cell strategies. Oncotarget 9, 17608–17619 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ye, L. et al. A genome-scale gain-of-function CRISPR screen in CD8 T cells identifies proline metabolism as a means to enhance CAR-T therapy. Cell Metab. 34, 595–614.e14 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mise-Omata, S. et al. SOCS3 deletion in effector T cells confers an anti-tumorigenic role of IL-6 to the pro-tumorigenic cytokine. Cell Rep. 42, 112940 (2023).
Google Scholar
Negishi, S. et al. Treatment strategies for relapse after CAR T-cell therapy in B cell lymphoma. Front. Pediatr. 11, 1305657 (2023).
Google Scholar
Liberzon, A. et al. The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 1, 417–425 (2015).
Google Scholar
Shi, H., Chen, S. & Chi, H. Immunometabolism of CD8+ T cell differentiation in cancer. Trends Cancer 10, 610–626 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dumauthioz, N. et al. Enforced PGC-1α expression promotes CD8 T cell fitness, memory formation and antitumor immunity. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 18, 1761–1771 (2021).
Google Scholar
Andreatta, M. et al. Interpretation of T cell states from single-cell transcriptomics data using reference atlases. Nat. Commun. 12, 2965 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Chimeric STAR receptors using TCR machinery mediate robust responses against solid tumors. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eabb5191 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nelson, R. FDA investigating safety risks in CAR T-cell recipients. Lancet 402, 2181 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ashburner, M. et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000).
Google Scholar
The Gene Ontology Consortium. The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2023. Genetics 224, iyad031 (2023).
Google Scholar
Schmiedel, B. J. et al. Impact of genetic polymorphisms on human immune cell gene expression. Cell 175, 1701–1715.e16 (2018).
Google Scholar
Joung, J. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout and transcriptional activation screening. Nat. Protoc. 12, 828–863 (2017).
Google Scholar
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200 (2011).
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
Google Scholar
Li, X., Cooper, N. G. F., O’Toole, T. E. & Rouchka, E. C. Choice of library size normalization and statistical methods for differential gene expression analysis in balanced two-group comparisons for RNA-seq studies. BMC Genomics 21, 75 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lun, A. T. L., Chen, Y. & Smyth, G. K. It’s DE-licious: a recipe for differential expression analyses of RNA-seq experiments using quasi-likelihood methods in edgeR. Methods Mol. Biol. 1418, 391–416 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).
Google Scholar
Clement, K. et al. CRISPResso2 provides accurate and rapid genome editing sequence analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 224–226 (2019).
Google Scholar
Roederer, M., Nozzi, J. L. & Nason, M. C. SPICE: exploration and analysis of post-cytometric complex multivariate datasets. Cytometry A 79, 167–174 (2011).
Google Scholar
Bray, N. L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P. & Pachter, L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 525–527 (2016).
Google Scholar
Frankish, A. et al. Gencode 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D916–D923 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hao, Y. et al. Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01767-y (2023).
Welch, J. D. et al. Single-cell multi-omic integration compares and contrasts features of brain cell identity. Cell 177, 1873–1887.e17 (2019).
Google Scholar
Trapnell, C. et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 381–386 (2014).
Google Scholar
Aibar, S. et al. SCENIC: single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering. Nat. Methods 14, 1083–1086 (2017).
Google Scholar
Andrews, S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. GitHub https://github.com/s-andrews/FastQC (2010).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Google Scholar
Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10, giab008 (2021).
Google Scholar
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
Google Scholar
Amemiya, H. M., Kundaje, A. & Boyle, A. P. The ENCODE Blacklist: identification of problematic regions of the genome. Sci. Rep. 9, 9354 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
Google Scholar
Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576–589 (2010).
Google Scholar
Ramirez, F. et al. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W160–W165 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
Google Scholar
McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).
Google Scholar
Cameron, D. L. et al. GRIDSS: sensitive and specific genomic rearrangement detection using positional de Bruijn graph assembly. Genome Res. 27, 2050–2060 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Meltzer, P. & Davis, S. RCircos: an R package for Circos 2D track plots. BMC Bioinformatics 14, 244 (2013).
Google Scholar
For more tech updates, stay tuned to our blog.
